Richard Humphreys QC represents couple in the High Court

Wed, 06 Jun 2018

Ouseley J. dismissed an appeal brought by way of Case Stated by London Borough of Camden against the decision of Highbury Magistrates Court to dismiss informations against Mr and Mrs Galway-Cooper for failure to comply with an enforcement notice requiring them to remove a three storey extension to their home and to restore the rear wall to its previous condition.

The District Judge had accepted the defence under s.179(3) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) that each Defendant had done everything s/he could be expected to do to secure compliance with the notice: it was not feasible to comply with the notice in that removal of a steel frame would be necessary and this would make it likely that the rear wall would fail.

The Respondents were represented by Scott Stemp in the Magistrates Court; and by Richard Humphreys QC in the High Court. Case Number: CO/5519/2017

Read more about the case here: https://www.planningresource.co.uk/article/1465797/judge-backs-homeowners-councils-impossible-enforcement-demands

 

Related articles

Richard Humphreys QC represented DB Symmetry Ltd in a dispute as to whether a planning condition required the developer to dedicate access roads as public highways or whether it merely regulated the physical attributes of the roads....

Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020
Following what is believed to be the first “fully virtual” planning inquiry in the new Covid 19 era, planning permission has been obtained on appeal, following a four-day public inquiry, for the erection of up to 250 dwellings at a site in Holmewood, Derbyshire....

Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020
Commencing from Monday 19th October at 09.45 on BBC Radio 4, No5 planning barrister, author and presenter Hashi Mohamed...

Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020