High Court grants permission to judicially review local authority age assessment practice

Fri, 19 Jun 2020

On 17 June 2020 Mostyn J granted permission to the claimant, RM, to bring judicial review proceedings against the Manchester City Council over its use of short-form age assessments.

RM is represented by No5’s Philip Rule instructed by Stuart Luke of Instalaw solicitors. The Refugee Council acts as RM’s litigation friend.

The claim advances the complaint, inter alia, that the Guidance in use by this local authority gives rise to the unacceptable danger of failing to acknowledge the margin of error in age assessments. Vulnerable minors are prejudiced by the application of the flawed Guidance which does not protect them from the unfairness of avoiding a Merton-compliant full age assessment where the potential for a margin of error must be appreciated.

Robin Knowles J had earlier ordered that Manchester must explain why it has declined to undertake a full age assessment, and whether the course it has taken in this case reflects a policy that it is applying in a number of cases.

The council has claimed he is aged 25 but RM maintains he is 17 and should be properly and fairly assessed.

Mostyn J noted that a case of this nature would normally be transferred to the Upper Tribunal for the factual issue to be determined there but observed that there were conventional judicial review challenges appropriate to be heard in the Administrative Court in Manchester.

Philip Rule and Stuart Luke also represented the successful claimant in the guideline case earlier this year of R (AB) v Kent County Council [2020] P.T.S.R. 746; [2020] EWHC 109 (Admin).

Related articles

The government has introduced into parliament a Victims and Prisoners Bill. This follows the “Root and Branch Review” of the Parole Board previously launched by the Secretary of State for Justice, and makes a number of provisions in relation to both victims and offenders....

Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023
Local Authority had a duty to age assess putative child independently of a Home Office assessment and case is not academic just because the Claimant has turned 18: David Gardner represents the Claimant in a successful judicial review...

Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023
Whilst we await the outcome of the Rwanda challenges in the High Court, this is an opportune moment to consider whether 'externalisation' and 'safe third country' practices are compatible with international refugee law....

Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022