The Court of Appeal orders remittal of Zimbabwean Appellants’ appeals as it would be in the interests of justice to do so

 

Each of the Appellants had claimed that they were at risk on return to Zimbabwe because of a fear from the President Mugabe regime. They also feared the Zanu-PF and the so called “War Veterans”. Their appeals had been rejected by the Upper Tribunal. 

 

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Pill, Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Warren) agreed that the correct course would be to allow the appeal and to ask the Upper Tribunal to decide the cases again. The Appellants had contended that their appeals ought to be allowed outright. 

 

The Upper Tribunal recently provided new country guidance in the case of CM (Zimbabwe) [2013] UKUT 00059 (IAC) and that was following a previous Supreme Court landmark judgment in SSHD v RT (Zimbabwe) and others, KM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD [2012] 3 WLR 345. The issue of the risk on return to Zimbabwe for those who do not support the President Mugabe regime has been the subject of numerous cases at the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal and the Tribunals in the last decade and it looks as if the issue will continue to be litigated further for some time to come. 

 

There are media reports that new elections will take place in Zimbabwe very soon and there has been concern expressed that in the run up to such presidential elections, the risk to ordinary Zimbabweans increases. Such persons have to show positive loyalty to the President Mugabe regime or face persecution. These Appellants had undertaken refugee sur place activities in the United Kingdom and fear a return to their homeland, claiming that they will be targeted and will have to prove their loyalty to the President Mugabe regime. 

 

Please click here to access the Court of Appeal judgment: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/237.html

 

Please click here to view the profile of Abid Mahmood