Risks of Internal Mediation

Mon, 19 Jul 2010

In Sakar v West London Health NHS Trust [2010] IRLR 508 the Court of Appeal reinstates the Employment Tribunal’s ruling that it was unfair to dismiss a consultant psychiatrist following complaints of harassment and distressing conduct when those complaints had initially been dealt with under the Trust’s “fair blame policy”. The Court of Appeal, unlike the EAT which had allowed the appeal, ruled that the Tribunal had been entitled to conclude that dismissal was outside the range of reasonable responsible because the use of this policy implied that in the Trust’s view that conduct was of a relatively minor nature and therefore the dismissal could not subsequently be justified on grounds of gross misconduct. 
However, it should always be remembered that in unfair dismissal cases, each case turns on its own facts and that the position may have been different if the Trust had made it clear beforehand that it regarded the allegations as potentially amounting to gross misconduct rather than seeking to escalate the matter by insisting, as part of the dispute resolution, that it be reported to the GMC.

Summary by Anthony Korn

Related articles

No5’s Serena Sekhon explains how to seek Core Participant status in the UK Covid-19 Inquiry...

Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022
An appellant whose appeal against deportation on human right grounds failed in the Court of Appeal and following the refusal of leave to appeal from the Supreme Court nevertheless succeeded in obtaining leave to remain from the UK Government after making a complaint to the Strasbourg Court....

Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021
Once again, the Home Office has been busy. Having brought in a comprehensive package of regulations, most notably in 2008 and 2012, it now proposes to make further sweeping changes to the way that misconduct and performance procedures are handled....

Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019