Planning Podcast - Episode 5 - Planning and the Courts

Tue, 12 May 2020

From No5 Barristers' Chambers, in the Planning Podcast, Richard Kimblin QC is joined by Jack Smyth and Hashi Mohamed, planning and environmental barristers at No5. They consider Covid consequences: timescales for planning litigation, social distancing for the courts. The Planning Podcast asks what happens if a scheme finds itself quarantined in the Court of Appeal – what happens when your study becomes a court room – and what is a house – yes, really – what is a house?

You can find the materials: if you subscribe to Westlaw, the paper in the Journal of Planning and Environmental Law may be found via the link “Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: pace and prospects for planning cases in the Court of Appeal” [2020] JPL 5, 470-483, and; the judgment on sub-division and §79 of the Framework is R (oao) Wiltshire Council v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government and Mr Howse [2020] EWHC 954 to be found on Westlaw, or Bailii.

 

Subscribe to our mailing list to be kept up to date with the latest podcasts, events and news.

Related articles

Net Zero: what was the vision pre-covid and what are the Covid-consequences?...

Date: Fri, 01 May 2020
This week we start to look at covid consequences. Not what is happening now, or for the end of this lockdown period which extends to the VE Day celebrations....

Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020
In the second part of our inaugural podcast, the No5 Planning Team takes another look at topical issues from nitrates to planning for the future and case law updates....

Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020