Two No5 barristers secure urgent executive release of vulnerable recalled prisoner

Tue, 09 Jun 2020

Philip Rule and Avril Rushe were instructed in an urgent judicial review to challenge an unlawful recall, and a flawed executive release decision that did not provide reasons and notice, and had otherwise failed to properly consider the options for re-release. The parole board had also failed to prioritise Mr. J's  parole board hearing. 

The High Court granted expedition to the claim and listed the case for a speedy hearing.

Mr. J was then released by a further executive release decision, and, following negotiations, the claim settled with a significant ex gratia sum paid.

Philip Rule is the head of the Public Law group at No5 Barristers' Chambers, and a panel counsel to the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

Avril Rushe is a member of the Public Law and Immigration Law groups at No5 Barristers' Chambers.

 

They were were instructed by Ms Adriana Matrigiani of Reece Thomas Watson Solicitors.

Related articles

Parole Board concedes judicial review confirming it has power to hold an oral hearing to consider whether to suspend a life licence supervision...

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022
On 30 June 2022, the Secretary of State for Justice laid a statutory instrument (S.I. 2022/717) making significant amendments to the Parole Board Rules....

Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022
The inquest into the death of Robert Frejus concluded that failings by the prison and by prison healthcare possibly contributed towards his death. Robert died on 9 October 2018 at HMP Nottingham after self-harming. He was 29 years old at the time of this death....

Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022