Returning to work in the time of coronavirus - Part 3

Thu, 21 May 2020

In my previous two posts I referred to the protection against dismissal by sections 100(c),(d) and (e) of the ERA where employees refuse to work in circumstances of danger which they reasonably believe to be 'serious' and 'imminent' and the difficulties employer's may face if they require employees to return to work at the present time. Equivalent provisions apply where an employee suffers a 'detriment', for example where an employer refuses to pay an employee who refuses to return to work in such circumstances (Section 44 of the ERA). However, subject to the exceptions I identified in my second post, employees will normally have to return to work to 'reasonably' assess the risk. For example, whether the proposed system is effectively enforced or supervised. One of the many potentially difficulties is where it is not possible to socially distance in a particular workplace. It is arguable that employees may have a right to refuse to return unless other protective steps are taken to address the risk.

Related articles

If you are looking to enforce a restrictive covenant in a business protection case, the High Court’s recent decision in Peltrade Ltd v Scanlan [2020] 9 WLUK 34 is a timely reminder of how not to do things....

Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020
Update from Tony McDaid on No5's latest position during Covid-19...

Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020
We are delighted to announce that three members of our Employment Group have been appointed as part time judges....

Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020