Government has Amended NPPG Guidance on Wind Turbines

Thu, 25 Jun 2015

The Government has amended NPPG guidance on wind turbines to read:

“What are the particular planning considerations that relate to wind turbines?

 

The following questions should be considered when determining applications for wind turbines:

  Do local people have the final say on wind farm applications?

  How are noise impacts of wind turbines assessed?

  Is safety an issue when wind turbine applications are assessed?

  Is interference with electromagnetic transmissions an issue for wind turbine applications?

  How can the risk of wind turbines be assessed for ecology?

  How should heritage be taken into account in assessing wind turbine applications?

  Is shadow flicker and reflected light an issue for wind turbine applications?

  How to assess the likely energy output of a wind turbine?

  How should cumulative landscape and visual impacts from wind turbines be assessed?

  What information is needed to assess cumulative landscape and visual impacts of wind turbines?

  Decommissioning wind turbines”

 

The difference between the old guidance and the new guidance is the addition of the first indent “Do local people have the final say on wind farm applications?” Many will find this strange. Local opinion based on planning grounds is an established material consideration; but a local veto is not. There will be concern about the idea that local people should have a veto on a type of development that is often unpopular, but which helps to meet a need, in this case the need for energy supplies. If this approach is applied to wind turbines, will we see it applied to some of the following: prisons, probation hostels, housing on green fields, quarries, Gypsy sites, fracking and transport infrastructure? Or will there be a recognition that unpopular development is often needed. Time will tell.

 

Article written by No5 Barrister Tim Jones

Related articles

Personal Injury analysis: This analysis considers Master Cook’s judgment in RXK in which he sets out the circumstances in which the court will order an interim payment despite final quantification still being some years hence. It explains why this will be welcome news for claimant solicitors, even though no substantive decision was given in the case....

Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019
No5 Barristers’ Chambers joined forces with Moore Blatch Solicitors to host an “inspiring evening” to mark the centenary of women in law....

Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019
In her article published today in the New Law Journal, “Duty of care: Inadequate safety nets?"...

Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019