Fact-finding in the Court of Protection

Fri, 27 Nov 2015

On Wednesday 25 November 2015, the President of the Court of Protection handed down the long awaited judgment in the case of AG: [2015] EWCOP 78. Nageena represented AG, instructed by the Official Solicitor and opposed the appeal brought by AG’s mother (DG). The appeal raised a number of grounds including a criticism of the first instance Judge for failing to conduct a fact-finding hearing. The President of the Court of Protection initially granted permission to DG to appeal but on hearing the appeal in full, agreed with the submissions made on behalf of the Official Solicitor and local authority and dismissed all 4 grounds of the appeal. The judgment Re AG [2015] EWCOP 78 provides an analysis of the approach to be taken to fact finding in the Court of Protection.

To view the article written by Nageena Khalique QC and Rachel Thomas (Pupil) please click here.

Nageena Khalique QC is the Head of the Court of Protection Group at No5 Chambers. Please click here to view Nageena's profile.

Related articles

Personal Injury analysis: This analysis considers Master Cook’s judgment in RXK in which he sets out the circumstances in which the court will order an interim payment despite final quantification still being some years hence. It explains why this will be welcome news for claimant solicitors, even though no substantive decision was given in the case....

Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019
No5 Barristers’ Chambers joined forces with Moore Blatch Solicitors to host an “inspiring evening” to mark the centenary of women in law....

Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019
In her article published today in the New Law Journal, “Duty of care: Inadequate safety nets?"...

Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019