A child does not have the right to a solicitor at the start of the deportation process

Mon, 25 Jan 2021

In a ruling today the High Court held that a child detained under the sentence of a court did not have an automatic entitlement to a solicitor to help him understand and respond to service of formal notice of liability to deportation.  

The court rejected the claim of a Portuguese child that such right could be derived from the Charter, section 55 or the common law in the exercise of former Treaty rights under the Citizens Directive or the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016. Although the possibility of procedural unfairness was not ruled out in the claimant’s case, the court held that the First-tier Tribunal should decide if the actions taken against him as a child and which culminated in the decision to deport him, taken on his eighteenth birthday, caused his removal to be unlawful.   

R (Mendes) v SSHD [2021] EWHC 115 (Admin) (25 January 2021)

No5 Barrister’s Chambers Becket Bedford and Mark Bradshaw acted for the claimant instructed by Instalaw solicitors. 

Related articles

David Gardner has been appointed to the Welsh Government’s Panel of Approved Counsel....

Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021
No5 Barristers, David Gardner and Nabila Mallick, have obtained permission to apply for judicial review in the case of R (DK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (CO/4585/2020)....

Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021
With days till implementation/transition period ends on 31 December, Secretary of State concedes Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016 are unlawful in failing to legislate for Retained retained rights of residence for Former Family Members (FFMs) since February 2017 under Regulation 10 - transposing Article 13(2) of #citizens #directive 2004/38/EC....

Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021