Graham Henson

Defended where five men were charged with importing counterfeit cigarettes up to a value of 5.8m. Complex issues with regards to Confiscation proceedings resulting in payment of almost 500K

Leading Junior for Complex Casework Unit. Conflict between two muslim families which resulted in charges of attempted murder and firearm allegation which left one complainant disabled. Complex cultural issues and consideration given to the provisons under CJA 2003

Defendant charged with kidnap and false imprisonment where 2 complainants were held for 10 hours whilst being threatened with a machete. Defendant was found not to be the main instigator and was acquitted of blackmail and robbery charges

Defence Junior on complex case where defendants were charged with serious sexual offences including rape and possession of indecent images. The defence called expert evidence and an abuse of process argument was held based on the principle set out in R v Grant [2005] 2Cr.App.R.28

Prosecuted child cruelty case, issues with regards to non-accidental injuries and failure to seek appropriate medical evidence

Trial prosecuted for the Complex Casework Unit involving the transfer of criminal property, complex issues with regards to schedules of banking and the transfer of funds between many bank accounts

Defended teacher charged with possession of indecent images. Expert evidence required with regards to access to the indecent images and non UK astronomy website hiding images.

Defending multi million pound fraud case involving almost 25k pages of prosecution evidence. Following the illness of a co-accused during the trial legal argument based on the principles set out in Connelly -v- DPP (1964) Ac 1254 concerning abuse of process and application to stay proceedings.

Defended evangelical preacher charged with rape issues concerning breach of trust

Defendant charged with possession of a firearm concerning an armed robbery. Consideration of Cell site analysis and bad character concerning gang membership

Represented Solicitor charged with conspiracy to obtain passports by deception. Defendant was acquitted of all charges.

Defendant charged with attempted murder, co-accused discharged a shotgun at the complainant. Both defendants were drug addicts. Expert evidence with regards to the ballistic evidence. There was always a threat of a cut-throat defence as co-accused wished for client to give evidence that she had been raped by the complainant.

probably the most important decision on racial prejudice in our trial process that there has ever been.