KA (Afghanistan) v SSHD [2019] EWCA Civ 914
On the correct application of section 8 of Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004 Act
Becket Bedford is an experienced barrister and is part of the Immigration, International and Public Law teams.
Supreme Court Advocate: 30 years experience in all major courts and tribunals, with expertise in Convention law, EU law, Public law, the law of International Protection, Immigration law, Tier 1, Article 8, Deportation, Unlawful Detention, Discrimination and Commercial law. Undertakes direct access work, publicly funded work and GLD work.
On the correct application of section 8 of Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004 Act
On the liability of the EU for breach of fundamental rights under the CFSP
On the costs of a successful Cart claim
On balance sheet approach to human rights appeals and deportation
Whether the UK test for asylum is correctly aligned with Strasbourg (GC) case law
Damages claim for unlawful detention
Costs on the withdrawal of public law claim
On the return of a deportee removed under s94B
Compatibility of domestic right of asylum appeal with Common European Asylum System
Tribunal should be slow to draw adverse inferences from child screening in asylum cases
Systematic failure on part of SSHD to conduct family tracing for children in asylum cases
Correct approach to age assessment of children in asylum cases
Widower’s entitlement to widows’ pension
Judicial review of European Commission competition decision
Judicial review of European Commission competition decision
Modern case on unconscionable bargain
Seminal case on damages for breach of EU competition law
Court of Appeal not bound by own decision on EU law
Supreme Court Advocate: 30 years experience in all major courts and tribunals, with expertise in Convention law, EU law, Public law, the law of International Protection, Immigration law, Tier 1, Article 8, Deportation, Unlawful Detention, Discrimination and Commercial law. Undertakes direct access work, publicly funded work and GLD work.
On the correct application of section 8 of Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004 Act
On the liability of the EU for breach of fundamental rights under the CFSP
On the costs of a successful Cart claim
On balance sheet approach to human rights appeals and deportation
Whether the UK test for asylum is correctly aligned with Strasbourg (GC) case law
Damages claim for unlawful detention
Costs on the withdrawal of public law claim
On the return of a deportee removed under s94B
Compatibility of domestic right of asylum appeal with Common European Asylum System
Tribunal should be slow to draw adverse inferences from child screening in asylum cases
Systematic failure on part of SSHD to conduct family tracing for children in asylum cases
Correct approach to age assessment of children in asylum cases
Widower’s entitlement to widows’ pension
Judicial review of European Commission competition decision
Judicial review of European Commission competition decision
Modern case on unconscionable bargain
Seminal case on damages for breach of EU competition law
Court of Appeal not bound by own decision on EU law
Supreme Court Advocate: 30 years experience in all major courts and tribunals, with expertise in Convention law, EU law, Public law, the law of International Protection, Immigration law, Tier 1, Article 8, Deportation, Unlawful Detention, Discrimination and Commercial law. Undertakes direct access work, publicly funded work and GLD work.
On the correct application of section 8 of Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004 Act
On the liability of the EU for breach of fundamental rights under the CFSP
On the costs of a successful Cart claim
On balance sheet approach to human rights appeals and deportation
Whether the UK test for asylum is correctly aligned with Strasbourg (GC) case law
Damages claim for unlawful detention
Costs on the withdrawal of public law claim
On the return of a deportee removed under s94B
Compatibility of domestic right of asylum appeal with Common European Asylum System
Tribunal should be slow to draw adverse inferences from child screening in asylum cases
Systematic failure on part of SSHD to conduct family tracing for children in asylum cases
Correct approach to age assessment of children in asylum cases
Widower’s entitlement to widows’ pension
Judicial review of European Commission competition decision
Judicial review of European Commission competition decision
Modern case on unconscionable bargain
Seminal case on damages for breach of EU competition law
Court of Appeal not bound by own decision on EU law
The decision of Murray J in R (NCA) v Hao & Ors [2024] EWHC 2240 (Admin) caused sharp intakes of breath in the family offices…
No5’S Becket BEDFORD and Susana Ferrín Pérez will be speaking at the Navigating Change: Networking and Legal Updates event on Thursday 1st August from 4pm…
The decision of Murray J in R (NCA) v Hao & Ors [2024] EWHC 2240 (Admin) caused sharp intakes of breath in the family offices…
No5’S Becket BEDFORD and Susana Ferrín Pérez will be speaking at the Navigating Change: Networking and Legal Updates event on Thursday 1st August from 4pm…
