Judicial Review: Case Update

Home > Media > Publications > Judicial Review: Case Update

Sun, 14 Dec 2014

Philip Dayle, barrister at No5 Chambers, recently presented a Case Upate at the Judicial Review Seminars which were held in Birmingham and London.

You can download the notes below, which review two cases from earlier this year. The first case discusses the issue of costs and what may be considered to be an unreasonable refusal to engage in Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR) or not. The second case examines the scope and implications of an order that an application for permission to judicial review is totally without merit.

Details of upcoming events can be found on the Seminars and Events page.
The Public Law Group Clerks can be contacted on 0845 210 5555, or at public@no5.com

Related articles

The importance of not just having knowledge of ‘material facts’ but also ‘attribution’ of those material facts, pursuant to section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980.
Personal Injury, Professional Negligence and Costs specialist Stephen Goodfellow of No5 Barristers’ Chambers discusses the recent decision in Witcomb v J Keith Park Solicitors [2023] EWCA Civ 326, which concerns the failure of solicitor and counsel to advise a claimant of the option of seeking provisional damages....

Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023
Entering properties to fit a prepayment meter – what test should the Magistrates apply when granting a warrant?
In this article I highlighted that the Act is limited in scope and did not offer much guidance on how the Act is to be interpreted and applied. There has also (until my case below) been no judicial guidance on the correct application. The Magistrates Court Guide provided little assistance either....

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023
Pupillage at No5 Barristers' Chambers: An Insider’s Perspective
Former pupil Harrison Burroughs discusses his pupillage journey at No5 Barristers' Chambers...

Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023